Unrelated:

  1. Home
  2. About
  3. Subscribe
  4. Archive
  5. Bibliography
Newer
Older
  • It is a revealing fact that few planners are content to say that central planning is desirable. Most of them affirm that we can no longer choose but are compelled by circumstances beyond our control to substitute planning for competition. The myth is deliberately cultivated that we are embarking on the new course not out of free will but because competition is spontaneously eliminated by technological changes which we neither can reverse nor should wish to prevent. This argument is rarely developed at any length — it is one of the assertions taken over by one writer from another until, by mere iteration, it has come to be accepted as an established fact. It is, nevertheless, devoid of any “objective facts” beyond our control but the product of opinions fostered and propagated for half a century until they have come to dominate all our policy.

    Hayek, 2007, on The “Inevitability” of Planning, p91
    Posted on June 2, 2010 Share Via Facebook
  • merlin
  • sylvar
  • glennz
  • putthison
  • fractalized
  • unhappyhipsters
  • bigweek
  • regulars
  • formationfit
  • joelbush
  • curvedwhite
  • datavis
  • popchartlab
  • everydaycarry
  • bookshelfporn
  • nocomplyatxproduct
  • yourmonkeycalled
  • tymn
  • blrting
  • fittestgames
  • justaddastra
  • ifttt
  • designlanguage
  • transgojonbot
  • enginefromthesky
  • misnamer
  • emmanuelgoldstein
  • charlesponzi
  • maryjuanita
  • runnerdad
  • process
  • toddwaldo
  • wellplacedpixels
  • worldawesomenessupdate
  • shittyposters
  • baseballrenaissance
  • fiatch
  • thatsshiny
  • bridgingthegapaustin
  • theaustrians
  • downside

Field Notes Theme. Designed by Manasto Jones. Powered by Tumblr.